About Me

Name: Brent
Location: Rosemount, MN
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Cordoba House with a Libertarian Slant

Originally when I heard that a group of Muslims have bought land near the site of the World Trade Center in New York, NY to build a community center, I was infuriated and opposed to it. But after listening to Jason Lewis of the Jason Lewis Show discuss this, on his show on Tuesday July 14 2010, I found my opinion of this community center / mosque shift from knee jerk opposition to be willing to argue that preventing it would be equal to denying Feisal Abdul Rauf and his congregation their Freedom of Religion.

When a friend of mine on Facebook raised the point that the memorial in Shanksville, PA being shaped like a Red Crescent, I noticed all of the others posting on that subject having the same knee jerk automatic opposition to it as I used to have. I decided to play a little bit of Devil's advocate, here are my comments:

1: Devil's advocate here: So because they happen to share a religion with the perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks, are we going to deny them their Freedom of Religion?

2:My point is Feisal Abdul Rauf and his congregation bought what was privately owned land that was for sale and if we deny them building their community center because they share the same "religion" as the 9/11 hijackers, how long before the government tells someone like James Dobson they can't build a church near Ground Zero because his beliefs are considered hostile and offensive to certain Democrat base group?

I'm only using Dobson as a hypothetical example, and NOT comparing him to al-qaeda.

With this administration a lot of slippery slope scenarios are coming to the forefront.

3:
From Nancy Fuchs Kreimer of the HuffPo:

Two blocks from Ground Zero -- around the corner from the Glad Tidings Tabernacle and up the street from the Christian Science Reading Room -- stands a former Burlington Coat Factory outlet damaged on September 11th . If all goes as planned, it will soon house Cordoba House, a community center and mosque open to people of all faiths.

I admit I am leery about allowing Islam a foothold anywhere near Ground Zero.

4: Feisal Abdul Rauf has said he wants to build coexistence between the West and Islam and TO MY KNOWLEDGE, he condems the radical elements of his religion.

My purpose was two fold, one to make the point so if we prevent them from building near a sacred site such as the World Trade Center how far down the slippery slope do we have to go before a ... See Moregroup of Christians are prevented from building a church or community center somewhere (for example in San Francisco) because that congregation believes (rightly) that homosexuality is an abomination in the sight of GOD?

If we can prevent Muslims from building near the World Trade Center because of a rightful disagreement with major elements of their holy book, how long before that precedent is used to stop a True Bible Believing and Preaching Church from being built near Haight Ashbury, because of the residents of that area having disagreements with teachings in the Holy Bible.

While I agreed with the court overturning the Texas Sodomy law, because it is none of the government's business what goes on between two CONSENTING adults in the privacy of their bedroom. Look at how the left is exploiting that ruling to further tear at the fabric of the constitution. Also look at how when the court found the mysterious "right to privacy" it paved the way for abortion to be legalized across the country, to hell with states sovereignty.

The other purpose was to stir up debate, perhaps you will now see where I am coming from.

5:
What does no one see how this precedent can and easily would be exploited by someone like Obama or God forbid if we ever get a more radical leftwing president to go against Christianity?

6: If we are at war with all of Islam, then lets round up all the Muslims in America put them on airplanes and send them back to Mecca then nuke it.

If we are at war with just radical Islam,then lets take Feisal Abdul Rauf at his word and let him and his congregation build their Community Center, but keep a watchful eye on them to make sure they're not promoting Wahabbi Islam..

Am I wrong for saying that this precedent could and would be exploited by the far left?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Raising Arizona Up

I love how Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Mark Levin and the "mainstream" conservatives (aka "Neo-Cons"), all say build a fence on the southern border. I used to agree 100%, but after I read the below article from John Stossel on the issue of a border fence and immigration, I found my views switching on the issue. As my main twitter (@brent4liberty) account profile says I am a recovering "neo-con", who more and more is leaning towards the Libertarian viewpoint on some issues such as the border, war, foreign policy in general, and other issues.

I hope you find this article though provoking and maybe even persuasive:

I like what John Stossel said about this issue. as you will read his comments below:

If we build the border fence, the people from latin America will find ways over it, under it, around it, and into the United States of America. Also we have a problem with people overstaying their visas, coming here from places like Britain and then never leaving.

Fencing borders isn't solution for illegal immigration
By John Stossel | Commentary | Story updated at 5:53 pm on 4/22/2009


The Obama administration says it will propose immigration reform next month. I wonder what it'll do.

As a libertarian, I'm for open borders. But America has become a welfare state, and as Milton Friedman pointed out, you can't have open borders and a welfare state.

Terrorism provides another reason. We can't have open borders when some people want to kill us.

So what should be done?

"Put troops with guns here," says Robert "Little Dog" Crooks, a self-appointed border policeman. Crooks leads the Mountain Minutemen, a vigilante group that tries to keep illegals from entering America.

"These borders have to be secured. We're at war," he told me on my ABC special "Bailouts and Bull."

Congress decided the best way to protect America is to build an expensive fence. When complete later this year, it will extend 670 miles along the Mexican border. But the fence won't stop the illegals. After all, the border is thousands of miles long.

"The smart smugglers ain't gonna go to where the high security's at," Crooks points out.

We watched as he walked through an unguarded tunnel into Mexico and back.

"Where's the Department of Homeland Security? Hello! Anybody here?"

The fence does make it a little harder for some illegals to cross, but San Diego Border Patrol Chief Michael Fisher acknowledges they still get past the fence. Some climb over the fence. We found dozens of abandoned ladders near the fence. One group of illegals even built a ramp to bring a truck across.

They also cut holes in the fences. It doesn't matter how high a fence is if you can cut right through it. The place I visited had holes every few feet.

So despite all your tax dollars spent, there's no evidence the fence has reduced the number of illegals who cross. A survey of thousands who came to the U.S.-Mexico border to sneak into America found that nine out of 10 did enter eventually.

Even if we built an impenetrable fence, it would solve only part of the problem. Half of America's undocumented migrants didn't sneak in. They came here legally and overstayed a tourist or student visa. The 9/11 terrorists did that. A fence wouldn't have had any effect on them.

"I don't know how anybody can't see that this stupid fence is a waste of money," says Drew Carey, the comedian and television host who recently woke up to the benefits of liberty and volunteered to host segments of Reason TV on the Web. He has a theory for why America has built a wall.

"Contractors get money from the politicians that they've donated to, and politicians get to say, 'I'm getting tough.' "

Politicians do like acting tough. U.S. Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, wants the fence electrified. "We do that with livestock all the time," King says.

Need I point out that Mexicans are not livestock?

Which brings me to ask: If it's good to wall off America, why just one-third of the Mexican border? What about our northern border? Last year, more Middle Eastern nationals were caught crossing illegally from Canada than from Mexico. And if we were to wall off Canada, we'd still have miles of East- and West Coast beaches. Should we put machine guns there?

"Don't be silly. Nobody's ever suggested doing anything mean," former presidential candidate and Congressman Duncan Hunter told me. He brags that he "built" the fence in San Diego. "I think the message is this, John, if you want to come into the United States, which has the biggest front door in the world, you gotta knock on the front door."

But, Drew Carey notes, America doesn't make it easy to knock.

"It's so hard to get a guest-worker permit. There's so many red-tape hoops you have to jump through. It's easier to sneak across the border. ... It should be: If you want a job, you can come here and work."

I agree. Most migrants do want to come here to work. They take jobs few Americans want to do. They pay taxes. Many become good citizens. We should make it easier for them to do that, legally.

• John Stossel is the former co-anchor of ABC News' "20/20", now on Fox Business Channel and the author of "Myths, Lies, and Downright Stupidity."

I do find myself vacillating on the issue of the Arizona immigration law, I hear the very persuasive arguments from the aforementioned people (Limbaugh, Hannity, Levin, et al) saying how the bill makes it illegal to racially profile and that it just enforces the federal law. But on the other hand I find Reason Magazines arguments to be persuasive on the issue. At this point I chose to remain neutral on the subject of the Arizona Immigration bill SB 1070 ( Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act ), until I research it more.

I personally am uncomfortable with the idea of Comprehensive Immigration Reform, the Obama administration and the Democrats will more than likely push sometime soon. I think the best idea is to make it easier for people to come here legally, de-incentivize the act of illegal immigration by making it impossible for them to find employment, cut them off from the welfare state, and when they commit a felony deport them.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Minnesota Couple Charged with crime for using racial slurs

Couple Charged After Using Racial Slurs

(story from WCCO-TV Minneapolis, MN: http://wcco.com/local/racial.slurs.couple.2.1677574.html )

(WCCO)


 

A couple accused of bias crimes against their neighbors were ordered to stay 80 feet away from those neighbors on Wednesday.

Paul Caliguire and his wife, Paula, are accused of using the "n" word toward their neighbors, as well as stalking and harassing them.

Jasmine Johnson, 9, who is bi-racial, was in court Wednesday and said the Caliguires have been harassing her.

"They called me the 'n' word and once the 'b' word," Johnson said.

White families who are friends with families of color have also been victimized.

"It's scary," 10-year-old Olivia Jurek said. "They follow me and they watch me and I don't feel safe in my neighborhood anymore."

The families all live near each other in Lake St. Croix Beach near Afton. The incidents escalated after Jessica Johnson and her daughter, Jasmine, moved in this fall.

Two weeks ago, neighbors say Paul Caliguire beat a black baby doll with a baseball bat while he was yelling the "n" word.

He then swung the doll from a noose.

Caliguire was arrested and charged with two felonies for harassment under the state's bias law. Paula Caliguire has been charged with two gross misdemeanors. Four families filed restraining orders against the Caliguires and for the past 10 days, they have not been allowed home without a police escort.

Stacy Fredericks, who has two bi-racial children said she is still worried.

"I feel our lawyer did good but me personally I am still really scared," Fredericks said.

The families filed restraining orders against the Caliguires.
For the past 10 days they have been barred from their home.

Under the compromise they can return but have to stay 80 feet away from neighbors. If they don't, they will be charged with a crime.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
 
Personally, I never condone racism in any form. Stories like this may or may not warrent reporting, but it seems like the racism stories rear their head when the One Big A$$ Mistake America regime needs them to.
 
I am personally surprised they didn't try to link the Caliguires to the Tea Party movement and/or the Republican Party.

 

I think the Caliguires might need to learn that this is the 21st century and keep your hate filled beliefs to your self.  I am torn on this, but on one hand if Paul Caliguire were solely on his own property it shouldn't be a crime that he was mistreating a black doll. But on the other hand this mistreatment of a doll is a very very disturbing indicator of possible future behavior. 
 
I think the Caliguires might need to start thinking about moving away from their present location, perhaps to an area where they might feel more at home.
 
Do you think the police were right to charge this couple, or like me are you a little uneasy with them being charged for what seems like a step beyond a thought crime?
 

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Change we can B.E.L.I.E.V.E. In?

http://www.independent.org/blog/?p=5939
 
Biometric Enrollment, Locally stored Information & Electronic Verification of Employment also known as National ID with Biometrics.

So, let me get this straight, Arizona's new Immigration Law is Ghestapo-esque because Law Enforcement can stop people based on REASONABLE SUSPICION and ask them to prove they are in the country legally, but a Biometric System National ID Card is perfectly fine with the Obama regime?
 
I oppose a National ID card no matter who is pushing it.
 
Your Social Security card was never designed to be used as an Identification Card for anything other than Social Security Administration related uses.
 
November 2, 2010 and November 6, 2012 both can't come fast enough, so we patriots can join the IRS, the Incumbent Replacement Service.
 
I support Arizona and it's new Immigration Law.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The left is a lot like Gollum / Smeagol

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DLvIFRNbqOshttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DLvIFRNbqOs

Watch the above video if you are not familiar with the character Gollum / Smeagol from Lord of the Rings to see what I am talking about:

In the Lord of the Rings movies Gollum was the evil accompanier to the hobbits on their quest to Mount Soron to return the ring before it could be taken by the evil forces. 

In the Lord of the Rings movies Smeagol was the good accompanier to the hobbits on their quest to Mount Soron to return the ring before it could be taken by the evil forces.

Smeagol / Gollum were the same body but different personalities.

The left when you are looking acts like they are benevolent, caring, and are looking out for your best interests. But when you are not looking they are plotting how to gain their "precious" power and lessen your liberties. Smeagol when the hobbits were paying attention to him acted like their friend and protector. But when the hobbits weren't looking or when they were sleeping he was battling between the good side (Smeagol) and his evil side (Gollum). Gollum wanted to take the ring back and kept saying that the hobbits stole it from him, which sounds a bit like the Black Liberation Theology that Rev. Jeremiah Wright preached from his pulpit and President Barack and First Lady Michelle Obama listened to for twenty years. 

In Black Liberation Theology they claim that America and the white man stole from the rest of the world (especially Africa) and that "The White Man's Greed runs a world in need" (which is a line from a Jeremiah Wright sermon and from Barack's book Dreams from my Father). In the campaign Barack Obama said "We are Five Days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America".http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cqN4NIEtOYhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cqN4NIEtOY He also talked about "returning the Nations wealth to its rightful owners" which in his mind the government unions, the poor and minorities, etc that we the capitalists in America stole from them.

My prayer for Obama is found in Psalms 109 verse 8: May his days be few (in office); may another take his place of leadership (and soon). I don't wish harm on the man, I sincerely pray for his safety and for his electoral defeat in 2012.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Fred Phelps, Westboro Baptist Church, S.C.O.T.U.S., and the Freedom of Speech

The Below pictures are taken from a Bing.com Image search:
   
 
As a Christian, a ex-Baptist, a liberty loving American and Libertarian leaning Republican, I despise the tactics of Westboro Baptist and Rev. Fred Phelps and his family.
 
Personally, I do not condone the tactics of the Westboro Baptist Church nor do I approve of the homosexual lifestyle. With the above statements made, I hope the Supreme Court rules in favor of the Westboro Baptist Church. Not because I approve of their actions, but because if the Supreme Court rules for Albert Snyder whose son Marine Lance Cpl. Matthew Snyder it would create a HUGE legal prcedent that could be used to silence political dissention against the current or any future presidential administration, current or future legislation, etc.
 
I do feel sincere sympathy for Mr. Snyder after losing his son in the War on Terror. I personally think funerals are a horrible palce to protest and that it is lower than low to protest at the funeral of fallen soldier who made the ultimate sacrifice to preserve our freedoms as Americans.
 
The only valid censorship of ideas is the right of people not to listen.  ~Tommy Smothers


Censorship reflects society's lack of confidence in itself.  It is a hallmark of an authoritarian regime.  ~Potter Stewart
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (7) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

White Collar Welfare

When we as conservatives gripe over President Obama cutting a large part of NASA's budget and say that we should not cut from NASA out of one side of our mouths then out of the other side of our mouths say we need to cut from programs like Food Stamps, Welfare, or other wealth transfer programs, it gives the left more ammunition to brand us as racists.

I believe 99% of conservatives are not racists.

NASA is just as much big government "socialism" as welfare related handouts. NASA is staffed by highly educated people of mixed races, whose job it is to help the United States explore space and sometimes in the case of people like Global Warming False Profit James Hanson funding the undermining of our liberties.With transfer payments like food stamps, medicaid, medicare, etc. bankrupting our nation, those do need to be gradually cut in size and scope. But when we are fine with the government funneling money to white collar welfare recipients like NASA, AIG, Wall Street, et al. it adds fuel to the fire of the race baiters like Jesse Jackson, Al "Not So" Sharpton, and Barack Obama. I think that we gradually need to ween people off of all welfare and help them develop marketable skills; This should be done as much as possible by the private sector not the government.

Michael Berry of  Houston, TX's KTRH AM 740 had a great and thought provoking discussion on this subject. He is in favor of preserving the funding for NASA, but he was open to both sides of the subject. In fact he was very thought provoking on this subject, he challenged the callers to explain why they were in favor of preserving NASA's funding and even challenged them to go beyond saying it is good for Houston's economy in answering the question. If you want to hear the discussion I am including the links to his podcast on iTunes for you to go back and listen to.

Hour 1:  http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?i=80769127&id=336776802

Hour 2: http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?i=80769128&id=336776802


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama a gift to conservatism??

Before you think I have my head stuck somewhere it doesn't belong  when I say that the election of Barack Obama has been a gift to the conservative movement, let me explain.
 
If John McCain had gotten elected, he would have been an endless source of frustration for us consertives, like Bush was towards the end of his term. But since he was a Republican (In Name Only), it would have been delaying the inevitability of a Democrat winning (probably Obama in 2012), because the American people would quickly have gotten fed up with him over things like Cap & Trade, Illegal Immigration, etc and thrown him out of office in 2012. Over those four years, the Democrats would have been backstabbing him like they did Bush and have done to McCain ever since 2000 or beyond, meanwhile gathering more vitriol and venom. Then when they got the White House in 2013, they would have almost assuredly over reached but had more and more powerful troops in their camp to ram their Marxist agenda down our throats.
 
Now with the Democrats showing their true colors the American people are waking up to the fact that the modern Democrat party is not the same Democrat party of their Grandfather, perhaps Father. Instead the Democrats have lurched so far to the left that a self proclaimed communist (Van Jones) was an advisor to Obama, a person who considers Mao Tse Tung a political hero of hers (Anita Dunn) is the (now outgoing) White House communications director, and so on and so forth. John F. Kennedy would not be welcome in the modern democrat party or so it seems.
 
If the American people once again trust the Republican party to be Republicans and have the reigns of power, they need to act like Republicans not Democrat Lites like they did most of Bush's term. To paraphrase Ronald Reagan, We need bold colors not pale pastels when it comes to the two parties. I am not 100% convinced that a third party is the best idea, because Ross Perot running third party in 1992 handed the White House to Bill Clinton. On the other hand being that I live in Minnesota and how I saw both the Republicans and the Democrats were allied against Jesse Ventura when he was our governor, and how nothing got done and that it was a good thing, perhaps if the Republicans start to go wobbly again, then it will be time for a third party.
 
I think err scratch that I KNOW the Silent Majority of Americans has been awakened and now that we are awake, we are as mad as hell, and we're not going to take it any more.
 
However the Republican party could easily snatch defeat from the jaws of victory if they nominate another John McCain / Lindsey Grahm type Republican (In Name Only). I feel this is evidenced by what happend in Upstate New York were the party brass nominated a very liberal RINO in DeDe Scozzafava, thus forcing the party loyalists to hold their nose and vote for her (except for the fact she dropped out then supported the Democrat). Thankfully in that case there was another choice in Doug Hoffman. In 2012, if we get another McCain type as our nominee, you'll see more and more steam behind someone like Ron Paul.
 
Please accept my apology for not posting anything lately, it is because I am unemployed and have been focusing on finding a job. Additionally I do alot of political commentary on my Facebook Page: http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?v=feed&id=1417080781
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Failed policies of the last eight..... MONTHS!

I am literally about ready to barf, after hearing the sound bite of Captain Catchphrase Barack Obama speaking before what Rush accurately described as the Star Wars Bar Scene aka the United Nations.
 
The Narcissist in chief Obama, trashes his country anytime he speaks to the world. Didn't his mother ever tell him, if you have nothing nice to say, shut the hell up?
 
Here is a letter I sent to the Minneapolis Star Tribune:
 

"You cannot legislate the poor into freedom by legislating the industrious out of it. You don't multiply wealth by dividing it. Government cannot give anything to anybody that it doesn't first take from somebody else. Whenever somebody receives something without working for it, somebody else has to work for it without receiving. The worst thing that can happen to a nation is for half of the people to get the idea they don't have to work because somebody else will work for them, and the other half to get the idea that it does no good to work because they don't get to enjoy the fruit of their labor." --Dr. Adrian Rogers

The policies of the current administration seem to be hell bent on trying to legislate the industrious class out of their wealth and then re-distribute to those who refuse to even attempt to work, and instead just sit home and take advantage of the generosity of the State. From my research it seems the widely thrown around number of the uninsured being 47 to 50 million people, is greatly inflated for all too politically convenient reasons, of legislating the industrious out of their (economical) freedom while in their minds legislating their preferred constituents into freedom. But as a wise person stated; “Capitalism is the unequal distribution of happiness, Socialism is the equal distribution of misery” But by enacting their brand of health care reform, the current administration will take more power out of the hands of the people. Instead this reform would increase the power in the hands of the few and well connected, instead of the many.

How much do you want to bet, it doesn't get published?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Stories from a Canadian friend of mine:

Stories from my friend Kurtis Keith of Manitoba:
I bruised some muscles in my back in a car accident not too long ago. Went to the hospital, and had to wait 7 and a half hours before I even got out of the first waiting room. Then waited another hour before the nurse came in to tell me the doctor would be around shortly. Half an hour later, a doctor comes in asks a few questions, touches this and that, then says that a xray specialist will grab me to get an xray. 45 minutes later, I get my xray and go back to the doctors room to wait another 15 to find out the xrays were negative, and it was just bruised muscles. So I spent about 10 hours in the hospital and had about 5 minutes with an actual doctor and 10 minutes getting an xray.

But some of the stories from the waiting room were pretty bad.

There was one very old man lying on some sort of stretcher thing, constantly moaning every 15 minutes or so, and the woman with him, likely his daughter, was constantly asking nurses to let them in, because he was in incredible amounts of pain. After about 2 hours of this, the man begin almost screaming uncontrollably, and finally they let him in to see a doctor after the daughter demanded they let him in.

Also an old couple who came in much later than I did, kept bickering. The old man every 10 minutes or so, kept asking his wife why they were in a hospital, and she would tell him it was because he passed out at home, and they drove here in an ambulance. The man would get upset and say he didn't pass out, or remember coming here in an ambulance, and he wanted to go home. And the wife would get annoyed and tell him that they can't leave until he sees a doctor and he would have to wait because it would still be awhile before they got in. This exact same conversation happened about 10 or so times, before the woman was so annoyed, she gave in to the husband, and they took a cab home without seeing a doctor.
 
Do we really want this here in the United States of America?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Van Jones

What does it say about the old guard media (NY Slimes, Washington Compost, NBC, etc) doesn't even blink an eye when a self avowed communist as an advisor to President Obama.
 
I heard somewhere (perhaps on Sean Hanity's show), that Van Jones faced less scrutiny to work in the White House, than Joe the Plumber faced just for daring to question Obama. According to Hannity (I believe), in order to even walk into the White House (to work), you have to fill out a background check questionnaire (unless you are one of Obama's czars).
 
So, let me get this straight if your name is Samuel Joseph Wurzelbacher  (Joe the Plumber) and you dare question the mesiuhh (Obama), every parking ticket and speeding ticket is fair game. Also if your are Joe the Plumber, the hard left will make up allegations on you and have one of their stooges dig into classified state records to dig up garbage on you. Of course, the old guard media will happily recite the Obama administration's talking points on you if you are Joe the Plumber and dared to question Barack Obama.
 
But if you are Anthony "Van" Jones, you can be an self avowed communist, 9/11 truther, and say some crazy stuff and the media will say nothing about it whatsoever..
 
Here are a few intersting videos on Van Jones:
 
Glenn Beck's expose on Van Jones:
 
Van Jones spews about "enviromental justice" and white polluters.
 
Van Jones: Only "Suburban White Kids" Shoot up Schools
 
Van Jones portrays Bush as a "crackhead" (apparently he doesn't understand the laws of supply and demand)
 
Van Jones: Bush used the Flag to "Lynch" War Dissenters
Authoritarian sentiment, took over this country, burned the constitution... Oh he must be talking about his boss, Obama.
 
I think the above links are enough to prove the guy is nuts.
 
In a future post I will go into the whole Truther vs. Birther comparisons. For now I will say this, the Democrat Party will never disavow the Truther movement, but the Republican Party has already thrown the Birthers under the bus.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Legislate into freedom?

"You cannot legislate the poor into freedom by legislating the industrious out of it. You don't multiply wealth by dividing it. Government cannot give anything to anybody that it doesn't first take from somebody else. Whenever somebody receives something without working for it, somebody else has to work for it without receiving. The worst thing that can happen to a nation is for half of the people to get the idea they don't have to work because somebody else will work for them, and the other half to get the idea that it does no good to work because they don't get to enjoy the fruit of their labor." --Dr. Adrian Rogers
 
It is obvious that Barack Obama and the progressives either think that they can legislate the poor into freedom or they are trying to tear down the America that founders envisioned with intentions of re-building it into Eastern Europe. It is my belief that they say they are legislating the poor into freedom while really they don't give hoots in hell about the poor. They use the poor to tug at the heart strings of the average nightly news watcher into surrendering their freedoms and liberties to the government, thinking that they are helping the poor. If you look at the inner cities, which the Democrats have owned for years. Since the Great Society and War on Poverty there has been BILLIONS OF DOLLARS in wealth transfer payments to the poor and indingent people in the inner cities.
 
I heard an African American Conservative caller to a local morning talk show here in Minneapolis/ St. Paul area state "that the Democrat Party has always wanted to the black people on the plantation, it used to be the master's plantation in the old south, and now it is the Government (dependency) plantation." Personally, I would say they don't just want to keep the african-americans on the plantation, but also to put all Americans on some form of welfare and thus depend on and vote for Democrats.
 
Is it too harsh to say that Obama and his administration aren't just socialists, but approaching the level of communism or facism?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

One Big A$$ Mistake America

 
I love how Barack Obama keeps saying that expanding Government Run Health Care will not increase the national debt and increase jobs.
 
So let me get this straight, we have the government increase its spending, increase the taxes, which in turn will kill jobs and when less people are working, the government then gets less revenue, and then in order to keep costs down, they will ration the treatment.
 
I "stole" the following from a caller to the Jason Lewis Show:
One
Big
A$$
Mistake
America
 
Tags: obama  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Stop A.C.O.R.N.

I applaud Michele Bachmann for rising up to try to keep A.C.O.R.N. from getting taxpayer money. She does face an uphill battle in this matter, because A.C.O.R.N.'s friends are in control of the House and Senate. Like Michele Bachman recently said on Mark Levin's radio show, Yes, it may be an uphill battle but if the American people rise up, perhaps the Democrats will listen to them. I personally want to share in her optimism but A.C.O.R.N., George Soros, and other hard left wing money men speak louder than you and I, when it comes to the Democrats in Washington D.C.
 
While I am not optimistic of our chances to be heard on this, I urge all to sign the petition at htttp://www.ipetitions.com/petition/TaxDollars
 
We the Silent Majority can no longer afford to be Silent anymore, because if the Democrats gain seats in 2010 and if Obama gets re-elected in 2012, I am affraid it might be curtains for the American Republic as we know it. In the meantime we need to rise up and fight A.C.O.R.N., Organizing For America, Moveon.org, George Soros, the Far Left Wing Democrats, and others from instituting their Universal Health Care plans, The (un)Fairness Doctrine, and many other things that would cause the Founding Fathers to roll over int heir graves if the knew what is going on.
 
God Bless and Save America!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

David Letterman and Sarah Palin and other random topics

Let me get this straight, if you are a left wing comedian it is fine to make fun and talk about rape when it comes to the daughter of a conservative politician. However if someone in the 90's had made a similar joke about Chelsea Clinton, they would have been crucified in the press.
 
I find it shocking that N.O.W. actually stuck up for Sarah, Willow, and Bristol Palin. Usually N.O.W. more accurately resembles National Organization of Liberal Women.
 
Sitting at the computer today June 12, 2009, I would say that Sarah Palin is one of my top favorites to run againist the mesiuhhh Obama. Others that appeal to me are Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal, Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels, South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford, US Congressman Ron Paul from Texas, and perhaps others. Even though I live in Minnesota and voted for him twice, I would much rather not have Tim Pawlenty anywhere on the Republican Ticket, because he is a Watermelon Patch Republican in Name Only. Tim Pawlenty is a big proponent of corn ethanol, a believer in the new State Religion of Global Warming or Climate Change or what the hell ever the new talking point term is.
 
Global Warming, Climate Change is a massive trojan horse that is being used to get Americans to sacrifice their liberty, the sovereignty of America, their economic prosperity, and other normal everyday choices all in the name of saving the planet.
 
Some of my favorite sites for conservative news and personalities:
10: www.danconryshow.com ( I miss his radio show and wish he would get another radio gig and SOON!)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12Next »